In this week’s episode, we discuss the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles, which has destroyed the neighborhood where Heather grew up. Why does California burn, how are fires different now than they used to be, what happens now? We discuss the Getty Villa and Palisades Village, and why we should care what happens to a wealthy neighborhood in West LA. Also: did the LA Fire Chief drinking the DEI Kool-Aid contribute to the devastation? And when are natural disasters not entirely natural? Then: Zuckerberg announces changes to fact-checking, filters, and trust and safety teams at Meta. It’s not an apology. Are the changes politically motivated, or market-driven, or philosophical, and will they stick? At the same time, Musk announces plans for algorithmic deboosting on X. Zero is a special number.
Our sponsors:
CrowdHealth: Pay for healthcare with crowdfunding instead of insurance. It’s way better. Use code DarkHorse at http://JoinCrowdHealth.com to get 1st 3 months for $99/month.
Sundays: Dog food so tasty and healthy, even husbands swear by it. Go to http://www.sundaysfordogs.com/DARKHORSE to receive 35% off your first order.
Pique’s Nandaka: delicious mushroom, tea, and chocolate drink that provides all day energy. Up to 20% off + free frother+beaker at http://www.Piquelife.com
Mentioned in this episode:
Scope of the LA fires from The Lookout: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjE9xVU4eUA
Heather’s childhood LA fire experience: https://naturalselections.substack.com/p/antipode-chapter-1
Jacob Soboroff on the Palisades Fire: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DEkTEKdJxe9/
Fox News in Palisades Village: https://x.com/BigFish3000/status/1877008354008035683
Getty History: https://www.getty.edu/press/pdfs/Getty_History_and_Timeline.pdf
DEI LA Fire Chief: https://x.com/amuse/status/1876873508006842709
Zuckerberg announces changes: https://x.com/andrewcurran_/status/1876624442643878065
Musk does too: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1875355425601999255
Fact checkers aren’t scientists: https://naturalselections.substack.com/p/coming-soon
We have "cartesian blinders being put on us so that we are trying to make sense out of scraps of information and hints." - @bretweinstein
WEINSTEIN: I mean, even if you have your villains who are engaged in the behavior that motivated this war in Iran, even if that's the story, presumably most of the people in the path of these ferocious bombings that he is describing are not deserving of going back to the Stone Age.
In fact, I distinctly remember him telling us that part of what we were up to was liberating the people of Iran from their tyrannical regime.
So if it's the tyrannical regime that justifies the ferocious bombing, then it's a tragedy that other people are going to be sent back to the Stone Ages with them. Right?
HEYING: It's it's not a narrative. It's an incoherent set of talking points.
WEINSTEIN: Yeah, it's a kind of cheerleading that is completely inappropriate from the perspective of the president.
Bret Weinstein discusses the Trump administrations "back to the stone age" recent remarks in the latest episode of The Evolutionary Lens, Episode 320 "Are we back in the stone age?" on DarkHorse.
Bret Weinstein explains, "If you stop businesses from starting here, and if you drive people so that they move elsewhere—even though it's difficult to do—then the point is the tax base dries up, which then forces you to become even more predatory for the people who stayed.
And that's really the thing, right? They're setting themselves up so that they have to go after more and more people, because the people who are starting new businesses are not going to do it here."
Brett, with much respect I am reaching out in not-so-quiet desperation.
Our country is going to heck in a handbasket, you know this...
I most generically identify as a libertarian, an artist, an inventor, and perhaps a philosopher if I'm feeling particularly vain.
I've been building the infrastructure for what i believe the founding fathers would have given us if they had access to blockchain technology.
It is my E=MC2 of governance. there are only 3 laws, no taxes, incentives where they belong, radical transparency, and data driven justice.
I think it would be best for you to just go see it for yourself (note: rome wasnt built in a day)
I'll answer any questions pending a reply
Go to :
I'm all in on saving this place, we might just have to give up on the name "America", or get enough motivation to commandeer it (allegedly). I really don't care either way...
Anyway, get back to me!
Stay safe
I am trying to pass the Arizona Aviation Reporting and Scientific Inquiry Protection Act
And looking for supporters. The mission is simple: ensure that individuals can lawfully report unidentified aerial phenomena or pursue legitimate scientific research without risking their employment, professional credentials, or employer-controlled retirement benefits solely for doing so.
Starting at the state level offers a more tactical and achievable path than attempting to establish comprehensive federal protections. Arizona could serve as a starting point, with the potential for similar legislation to be introduced in other states.
Arizona is my home. I know the state, its communities, and its petitioning landscape well. It also has a long history of aerospace development, aviation operations, astronomical research, and scientific discovery.
The institutions and communities that could potentially benefit from such protections include:
Luke Air Force Base, its personnel, and surrounding aviation operations
...
