Why you should pay attention to the Charlie Kirk assassination

Stories that diagnose the system

If you’re like me and you question the Charlie Kirk “lone gunman” theory (which is the dumbest coverup of all time, IMO), then you have to ask: what would have to be true for this assassination to happen if it wasn’t a lone gunman?

Similarly, if Covid didn’t emerge from the wild, as we were told, then what does it mean that it was engineered? Personally, I think if someone’s actions lead to the deaths of tens of millions of people, they should at the very least get a negative performance review and a stern, “Don’t do that,” and not rewarded with a presidential pardon.

But the real point is this: these questions are too uncomfortable for most people to even think about. And I believe that’s why so many mentally shut down around these topics and attack those who challenge official narratives. It’s an adaptive mechanism. Simply noticing the implications puts you at risk, because it would take a group of people with a tremendous amount of power to even pull off a cover-up of this magnitude.

It’s also why, during Covid, shows like DarkHorse were treated as beyond the pale. According to institutional dogma, (AKA Sam Harris logic) in times of emergency everyone is expected to get in line and “do their part,” because any challenge to the institutions, any introduction of doubt, is framed as dangerous. We were told that distrust in the institutions would cause people to hesitate at exactly the moment they were being asked to trust those institutions the most. The message was essentially: these institutions keep you safe, you can ask your questions later, but now is not the time.

You know what the biggest tell is? It’s the screaming you see from a small group of influential people anytime a podcast or show questions the narrative around the assassination. It’s the same emotional tactics used to shut down conversations around Covid or injectables, this idea that certain conversations are inherently dangerous, that merely entertaining them increases the likelihood of inspiring crimes from people on the fringes or preventing an innocent someone from getting the care the would have otherwise received (AKA stochastic terrorism)

But in reality, the opposite is true: it’s the suppression of thoughts and ideas that creates distrust in said institutions. It’s the continual emotional manipulation and appeals to authority that people are sick of, which hides under the guise of "being expert".

And by the way, if you’re anything like me, you might notice odd behaviors in yourself that you can’t fully explain. For example, I’ve realized I’m conditioned to never upset anyone , to feel guilty even typing something like this because one of my friends might read it and think less of me. Do you ever notice that in yourself? These strange, conditioned reflexes that don’t quite make sense?

Finally, as we all know, this country has been kept in a state of emergency since 9/11, and anyone implicated has every incentive to never allow the country to leave that state of emergency. Because it’s the reckoning that would naturally follow that is feared the most.