I have been thinking about the following the last several years and have drawn some dark horse conclusions. I’m boiling it down here and leaving it a riddle. It’s another way to see something we may rarely question.
“Political compass” or “left/right spectrum” is a mind trap. Radical isn’t included within the trap. Why isn’t it? Not for “a reason” but for the dangers of “reason” itself.
The political spectrum tool stamped in our brains, with its minor variants, is a brain trap to prevent political reasoning while deceptively posing as a tool of political reasoning. It functions in reality in the following ways.
1. Substitution of complex social thought with simplistic explanations.
2. Internal self denying the holism of our humanity by it assigning limited dimension personality to political beliefs.
3. Separation of popular social forces into false diametric opposition of each other.
4. Divorcing political agency from culture, pulling culture apart by its political parts.
5. Hiding the beneficiaries of this brain trap, making them invisible and innocuous.
6. Simultaneously as making these beneficiaries invisible, the brain trap gives to them everything it takes away from the rest of us, making themselves central to the self definition of all others.
The next thought in puzzling this is yours to take. Step back & examine for yourself the “left/ right spectrum tool” as a potential deceptive brain trap. Note what you observe. What other things do you see that I did not describe? What of my observations did you similarly note?
Now that you’ve given it thought, what is the invisible within it, that counterintuitively has the only clear definition, that informs all others which I allude to in my sixth point?
Cleaning “spas,” massive brains, and mirror experiments.
"Do these truths about manta rays make them less beautiful to you? Have I stolen wonder from you by telling you some of what we know? Or rather, have I provided you even more basis on which to find more wonder, seek more beauty in the world? I hope that the latter is true."
Dr. Heather Heying reading the beginning of the chapter on beauty from her upcoming book
On a recent Inside Rail episode, Bret Weinstein explains why he still calls himself a liberal to guest Brandi Kruse.
Watch the full episode here: https://darkhorse.locals.com/post/7654402/the-views-of-brandi-kruse-on-darkhorse-podcast
“We can’t blueprint our way out of this puzzle. We certainly can’t conserve our way out of this puzzle. That’s the reason I’m not a conservative.”
Will European wheat have an effect on Bret Weinstein? This is Part II of his European experiment, the results.
Watch Part I: https://rumble.com/v6pns8o-is-bret-allergic-to-european-wheat.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Dr. Bret Weinstein is running an experiment on himself. After a decade of avoiding wheat he has tried eating it while in Spain. In this update video he explains how he has been feeling and answers common questions around glyphosate and dry fasting.
Watch more on the topic of glyphosate and dry fasting from Bret and Heather:
It’s not Complicated: The 230th Evolutionary Lens with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying https://rumble.com/v52it2i-the-230th-evolutionary-lens-with-bret-weinstein-and-heather-heying.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Think Fast: The 252nd Evolutionary Lens with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying https://rumble.com/v5rcks8-the-252nd-evolutionary-lens-with-bret-weinstein-and-heather-heying.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Full Episode:
Title: A Dark Prediction
Subtitle: Thoughts from a Half-Mind
There is a great deal of reporting right now surrounding human trafficking, especially in relation to Romania, and the web of associations being drawn between that world, TPUSA, and Jeffrey Epstein. Wolves and Finance, Baron Coleman, and Candace Owens have all been pulling on different threads of the story, from Erica Kirk and her past connections in Romania to certain military figures and political networks closer to home.
The allegations being discussed are dark and deeply unsettling. They range from reported ties to the Romanian Angels Project and Colonel Otto Busher, to disturbing claims involving an underage girl and a photo shoot allegedly arranged for a minor. From there, the picture widens into questions about the modeling industry, the Tate brothers, the current president’s past connections to modeling, and Arizona political circles, including members of the Farnsworth family.
Here is what I think may actually be ...
Bret,
As I write this in my DarkHorse hoodie, I have heard you say multiple times that Trump would be impeached, if things in the election go poorly. I completely disgree for 2 reasons:
First, to get a conviction in the Senate you need 2/3rd majority (67 votes). If the Democrats were to win every single Senate seat open (35 of 35, including 13 deep red seats) they would have a 69/31 majority. Unless Trump actually committed a high crime, they might not even get 100% commitment from their party, e.g. Fetterman (although, I am sure it would be near 100%.)
Second, it would be a tactical mistake. If they have a majority in the House (fairly likely) and/or a majority in the Senate (important in controlling the agenda and committees) then they have the power they need to slow down the MAGA agenda. Trump will be a lame duck after the election whichever way it goes, and if he is impeached then the country gets a JD Vance taster, making him an incumbent President they have to run against if he is ...
