I’ll admit it. I was one of those dirty Candace Owens fans. Kinda still am, maybe? Still making sense of what is happening.
What hooked me was her series on French President Macron’s wife, and specifically her penis, built on the reporting of Xavier Poussard. An American podcaster taking on the president of France over his wife’s anatomy. I thought it was the most American gangster thing I’d ever seen. I was in.
For a while, watching Candace felt like watching Jordan Peterson in the early days, or Joe Rogan before he got involved with the gambling industry, or DarkHorse, of course, of course. You know, a dissident speaking truth.
Then, almost overnight, it all fell apart.
The fight that made no sense
Here’s the setup. Candace was heading into maternity leave pregnant with her fifth child, a boy she announced back in June. Meanwhile, a fight was brewing that seemingly had nothing to do with her.
Leah, the financial investigative reporter behind The Leah Files, had been digging into podcaster Shawn Ryan. His relationship with Peter Thiel. His defense tech investments. And Glacier, the “privacy” app he’d spent a year selling to his audience. Leah traced Glacier back to an intelligence contractor and showed the app had quietly rewritten its privacy promises and still keeps records it said it wouldn’t. Throw in contracts tied to what I’d call the Israeli surveillance state, and you’ve got a real story.
Exactly the kind of story the old Candace would have chased.
Instead, she went into full battle mode. Against Leah. (And in the middle of her maternity leave, no less. A lot of people were thinking, shouldn’t you be giving birth?)
She defended Shawn, saying nothing was off limits when she sat down with him a few months back. The very next day, she ran an ad for Glacier. From there it spiraled: screenshots of private DMs, digs at Leah’s poker past, a debate that got cancelled, and finally Candace publicly calling Leah mentally unwell. Which, if you’ve been paying attention, is the exact same strategy Candace claims Zionists use on everyone else.
It made zero sense. And did I mention this was all days before she gave birth?
Knowing when to cut and run
Why did she do it? I doubt there’s any way of knowing. And honestly, I’m not sure it matters.
What I’m learning is that the real trick is knowing when to cut and run. Think of the Star Wars prequels, or the second season of The Witcher. Sometimes you have to appreciate the early work and disassociate yourself from what came later under the same branding.
In my mind, there are two Jordan Petersons. There’s Jordan Peterson before The Daily Wire, and Jordan Peterson after. The second one doesn’t exist to me. :-P Which is a shame, because he truly inspired me, not just to clean my room, but by extension, my life. He told me things I needed to hear when no one else would.
I don’t know what is happening in the world right now, but cutting and running is starting to feel like a vital skill. We’ve watched it with the MAHA movement. We’ve watched it with DOGE. Certain people, and certain movements, run up against something really nasty, and I think it’s important for people to see that and recognize it. Honor those people for who they were and what they represented, while also distancing yourself from what they became and what they represent today.
The first front
I sometimes think about what I would do if I had influence. You know, a few hundred thousand followers or something.
Then I think that having influence might be the most dangerous thing in this world. Influence is more valuable than anything else right now. Information is always the first front of war, not the eighth, as our good friend Benjamin Netanyahu sometimes likes to say.
My hypothesis
Here is my current running hypothesis for what the whole Candace Owens collision (aka the Glacier App Mafia) was. I think it was an attempt to astroturf a kind of anti-Zionist Christian movement, one that would be heavily surveilled using the very technology they were promoting. As relations between Israel and the US continue to deteriorate, I think a plan was put in place to get ahead of the anti-Zionist, anti-Israel sentiment and start their own populist movement, instead of letting a genuine grassroots movement take hold.
That’s my absolute best guess at the moment. It’s what makes the most sense to me, and I’m happy to completely change my mind tomorrow as new information comes in.
We have "cartesian blinders being put on us so that we are trying to make sense out of scraps of information and hints." - @bretweinstein
WEINSTEIN: I mean, even if you have your villains who are engaged in the behavior that motivated this war in Iran, even if that's the story, presumably most of the people in the path of these ferocious bombings that he is describing are not deserving of going back to the Stone Age.
In fact, I distinctly remember him telling us that part of what we were up to was liberating the people of Iran from their tyrannical regime.
So if it's the tyrannical regime that justifies the ferocious bombing, then it's a tragedy that other people are going to be sent back to the Stone Ages with them. Right?
HEYING: It's it's not a narrative. It's an incoherent set of talking points.
WEINSTEIN: Yeah, it's a kind of cheerleading that is completely inappropriate from the perspective of the president.
Bret Weinstein discusses the Trump administrations "back to the stone age" recent remarks in the latest episode of The Evolutionary Lens, Episode 320 "Are we back in the stone age?" on DarkHorse.
Bret Weinstein explains, "If you stop businesses from starting here, and if you drive people so that they move elsewhere—even though it's difficult to do—then the point is the tax base dries up, which then forces you to become even more predatory for the people who stayed.
And that's really the thing, right? They're setting themselves up so that they have to go after more and more people, because the people who are starting new businesses are not going to do it here."
A funny thing happened to me the other day. I was talking to a former coworker about why I think mass immigration into the country is harmful in many ways. We had a friendly exchange, and I thought the conversation was going well. Eventually, she said she enjoys talking about politics, which shocked me. To me, how is that political? It's not like anyone voted on it, and nobody knew about it until far too late. But somehow, even expressing concern about it is a Republican thing to do?
I find the same line of logic when it comes to being injected with chemicals. Most people I know frame it as a political position, not as a question of personal health and safety in the least (never mind concepts like informed consent and bodily autonomy, which many of them are passionate about when it comes to reproductive rights).
I really take offense at being called an anti-vaxxer, even though that's ...
@bretweinstein & @heatherheying it's with much respect that I am reaching out in not-so-quiet desperation.
Our country is going to heck in a handbasket, you know this...
I most generically identify as a libertarian, an artist, an inventor, and perhaps a philosopher if I'm feeling particularly vain.
I've been building the infrastructure for what i believe the founding fathers would have given us if they had access to blockchain technology.
It is my E=MC2 of governance. there are only 3 laws, no taxes, incentives where they belong, radical transparency, and data driven justice.
I think it would be best for you to just go see it for yourself (note: rome wasnt built in a day)
I'll answer any questions pending a reply
Go to :
I'm all in on saving this place, we might just have to give up on the name "America", or get enough motivation to commandeer it (allegedly). I really don't care either way...
Anyway, get back to me!
Stay safe
I am trying to pass the Arizona Aviation Reporting and Scientific Inquiry Protection Act
And looking for supporters. The mission is simple: ensure that individuals can lawfully report unidentified aerial phenomena or pursue legitimate scientific research without risking their employment, professional credentials, or employer-controlled retirement benefits solely for doing so.
Starting at the state level offers a more tactical and achievable path than attempting to establish comprehensive federal protections. Arizona could serve as a starting point, with the potential for similar legislation to be introduced in other states.
Arizona is my home. I know the state, its communities, and its petitioning landscape well. It also has a long history of aerospace development, aviation operations, astronomical research, and scientific discovery.
The institutions and communities that could potentially benefit from such protections include:
Luke Air Force Base, its personnel, and surrounding aviation operations
...