Saying that ALP will not be ideological is interesting. Presumably, it would at least need a JBP-style unifying meta-narrative. Otherwise, it just ends up as a rudderless populist movement doomed to fall apart or consume itself.
For context, I am active in my State LP, and have been considering engaging with the Mises Caucus for some time. It isn't that I don't want it to work, at all; I just want to make sure it is done right.
We have "cartesian blinders being put on us so that we are trying to make sense out of scraps of information and hints." - @bretweinstein
WEINSTEIN: I mean, even if you have your villains who are engaged in the behavior that motivated this war in Iran, even if that's the story, presumably most of the people in the path of these ferocious bombings that he is describing are not deserving of going back to the Stone Age.
In fact, I distinctly remember him telling us that part of what we were up to was liberating the people of Iran from their tyrannical regime.
So if it's the tyrannical regime that justifies the ferocious bombing, then it's a tragedy that other people are going to be sent back to the Stone Ages with them. Right?
HEYING: It's it's not a narrative. It's an incoherent set of talking points.
WEINSTEIN: Yeah, it's a kind of cheerleading that is completely inappropriate from the perspective of the president.
Bret Weinstein discusses the Trump administrations "back to the stone age" recent remarks in the latest episode of The Evolutionary Lens, Episode 320 "Are we back in the stone age?" on DarkHorse.
Bret Weinstein explains, "If you stop businesses from starting here, and if you drive people so that they move elsewhere—even though it's difficult to do—then the point is the tax base dries up, which then forces you to become even more predatory for the people who stayed.
And that's really the thing, right? They're setting themselves up so that they have to go after more and more people, because the people who are starting new businesses are not going to do it here."
Bret and Heather discuss prepping, governmental fear-mongering, and a new political party in America.
The media would have us believe that we are being told to stockpile food by the government—but we’re not. We go through a history of U.S. governmental injunctions to stockpile (or not), before arriving at FORTRESS—Federal Operations for Resilience, Troop Resources, Energy, Supply, and Survivability—announced September 30, to ensure continuing operations if supply chains are cut.
Then: a new political party is being formed, and you are invited to join. The American Liberty Party is for patriots who believe in common-sense constitutionality.
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/3zScHmEs6Cfmh9QyIOMz79?si=mh4H_R0gSGmnpkHynh4Pgw
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7htdrm-the-350th-evolutionary-lens-with-bret-weinstein-and-heather-heying.html
Youtube: ...
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-way-forward-with-alec-zeck/id1544492743?i=1000798888741
Deep dive into Crowd Health
Don't fall for the doom and gloom
The media strategy to surpress populist movements
I'm of the firm opinion that the media right now is going throug ha chemotherapy of sorts. There is a flood of dispairing gloom being flooded through all channels, because it's a strategy for the impending elections. People who are in dispair are more likely to not persue a populist movement of any sort. They are more likely to disengage and become apathetic. It's a strategy, its a way to get through the elections without interference from popular opinion
